关于白城的作文

时间:2021-10-30 19:14:30 初中作文范文

篇一:《白城市中考满分作文-白城市作文》

有一个美丽的地方,

那就是它DD白城,

我的家乡。

过去的白城,

是一片未开垦的荒地,

抬眼望去处处都是平房。

傍晚漆黑没有灯光,

还哪谈得上什么商场?

过了二十年的时光,

白城人民奋发向上。

先修建了几个景观,

又扩建了市民广场。

如今的白城已彻底变了模样, 再也不是曾经的矮层砖房。

座座高楼拔地而起,

小区建得有模有样。

汽车走进千家万户,

生活的水平日渐增长。

白城的经济建设也逐渐增强, 先后建了几个工业工厂。

工业园区作为领头羊,

带领众多工厂奔向成功的前方。

城内的城市建设也发展向上, 政府投资修建运河两旁。

那时绿树成荫,河水流淌,

美丽的白城从此更加辉煌。

今后的白城将会更加繁荣,更加向上。 白城人从此挺起胸膛,

把理想的帆扬得如此长远,

把激情的歌儿唱得如此响亮。 愿各界朋友来白城投资建厂, 白城人民欢迎您来考察,观光。 琴声的悠扬配着少年的合唱, 会点起一把希望之火,

普照在白城这块宝地,

让它在晨光中闪闪发光!

啊,成长的白城,

我愿你的明天更美,更强,更辉煌!

篇二:《白城市中考满分作文-难忘那》

难忘那„„的目光

我是一只活泼可爱的小燕子,成天无忧无虑地自由飞翔。无意中我看到了各种各样令我难忘的目光——

无神的目光

今天早上,我在天空中闲逛了几圈,不知不觉有点累了,便落在了一座教学楼前的树上休息。无意中看到对面教室里的学生黑压压的一

片,都趴在课桌上埋头写着什么。桌上堆满了书本,像一座座小山。 “叮铃„„”下课铃声响了,所有的学生竟没有一个离开座位。校园一片喧闹,室内却一片沉寂。这时,从外面走进一个老师模样的人,手里抱着一沓厚厚的东西。

“同学们,下星期一举行期中考试,这几天大家一定要加紧复习。我这儿有一套复习题,抽课余时间做好,下午检查、评讲。”同学们一个个陆续抬起头来,一双双大而无神的眼睛直直地盯着老师,一点灵气都没有。一会儿,老师走了,大家又无精打采地写着可能是听他们说的叫什么“作业”的东西吧。

忧郁的目光

中午,我正在大树上欢快的高歌,忽然听到几个同学唉声叹气地说着什么。好奇心使我停止了歌唱,仔细听个究竟。

一个男生说:“哎,‘四眼妹’,这才几天你怎么又换眼镜啦?” “唉,还不是因为天天晚上‘加夜班’!这几天又近视了50度。”一位女生忧郁地回答道。

“是啊,每天的作业太多了!”几个学生异口同声地说。 “唉,有什么办法呢?命苦啊!”

“下午要听写单词,语文又要默写课文,地理又要小测验。” “可不是,过不了关还要打手板,留下不准吃饭。”

“妈呀!上帝,我不想活了!”

我同情地看着眼前这帮学生——每双眼睛都充满了忧郁,两道眉毛团成两只小毛球,神情十分痛苦。

无奈的目光

傍晚,我停息在一个阳台上,梳理我有点儿凌乱的羽毛。突然一连串震耳欲聋的怒吼,吓得我魂飞魄散。

“你这不争气的东西,除了能睡觉,还能做什么?老子辛辛苦苦一天忙到晚挣钱,不是就盼着你有点儿出息吗?可是你给我打了多少分?你还好意思睡!你把全家人的脸都丢尽了!看看对门的汪小玲,人家一天学到晚,长期考第一。人家的父母在我们面前耀武扬威,不就是仗着孩子成绩好吗?你什么时候也跟老子长个脸哪!„„” 原来是一位哥哥做作业时,不知怎么睡着了,结果引来了他老爸不分青红皂白一通辱骂。骂够了,随手扔过去几张试卷:“做不完今晚就别想睡觉!哼!”

这位哥哥无力地睁开一双大大的“熊猫眼”,眼中充满了无奈和忧伤,没有一丝光彩。

不知道这位哥哥昨晚上是不是没有休息好呢?

天渐渐暗了下来,望着夜空,我的脑海里不断浮现出一双双无神

的、忧郁的、无奈的目光,一种酸楚的感觉涌上心头。我庆幸自己不是人,不用被逼着学习和考试,没有分数和名次的烦恼,没有近视和试卷的折磨,我有完全属于燕子的自由。

可是,还有多少个哥哥姐姐将不断上演着今天的一幕幕呢? 点评:

标题填入省略号,有悬念,有意蕴,有创意;运用小标题,脉络清晰,构思有新意;材料虽然平凡,但从一只燕子的角度看学习负担过重的现实问题,有新意。特别是“我庆幸自己不是人,不用被逼着学习和考试,没有分数和名次的烦恼,没有近视和试卷的折磨,我有完全属于燕子的自由”一句话,发人深省;文章开头入题快,首尾呼应,处处点题,结尾一句话言尽而意无穷,耐人寻味;文章语言流畅自然,描写准确细腻。赋分:40分。

篇三:《白城GRE作文写作赏析》

智课网GRE备考资料

白城GRE作文写作赏析

想要提高新gre作文分数,我们就要深入地了解新gre写作要求,大家在备考新gre写作时要熟练掌握新GRE写作题库,懂得如何迎合评卷人的评卷思路,了解评分注重三方面,尽量提高AI部分的写作能力而力保AA部分满分,智课教育小编下面为大家详细介绍一下白城GRE作文写作赏析。

GRE作文范文

"The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished."

观点陈述型作文/[题目]

"被置于媒体审视下的任何人,其名誉终将受毁损。"{关于白城的作文}.

Sample Essay

The intensity of today's media coverage has been greatly magnified by the sheer number and types of media outlets that are available today. Intense competition for the most revealing photographs and the latest information on a

subject has turned even minor media events into so-called "media frenzies". Reporters are forced by the nature of the competition to pry ever deeper for an angle on a story that no one else has been able to uncover. With this type of

media coverage, it does become more and more likely that anyone who is subjected to it will have his or her reputation tarnished, as no individual is perfect. Everyone makes mistakes. The advances in technology have made much

information easily and instantaneously available. Technology has also made it easier to dig further than ever before into a person's past, increasing the possibility that the subject's reputation may be harmed.

范文正文

当今媒体报道的力度,由于当今时代所能获得的媒体渠道那前所未有的数量和种类,从而被极大地增强。围绕着对最具暴露性的图片及对某一题材最新信息所展开的竞争,使哪怕是次要的媒体事件也转变为所谓的"媒体疯狂"。由于竞争的本质,记者们被迫就某一项报道作深度采访,以其窥探到一个任何其他人都无法揭示的视角。随着这类媒体报道的出现,任何被置于媒体报道之下的人,其名誉越来越有可能被玷污,因为"金无赤金,人无完人"。每个人都有可能犯错误。技术进步使大量的信息在第一瞬间便被轻易获取。技术也使媒体得以比以往任何时候更深入地去挖掘一个人的过去,从而更增加了当事人名誉受损的可能性。

The above statement is much too broad, however. "Anyone" covers all people all over the world. There are people whose reputations have only been enhanced by media scrutiny. There are also people whose reputations were already so poor that media scrutiny could not possibly diminish it any further. There may very well be people that have done nothing wrong in the past, at least that can be discovered by the media, whose reputations could not be diminished by media scrutiny. To broadly state that "anyone" subjected to media coverage will have his or her status sullied implies that everyone's reputation worldwide is susceptible to damage under any type of media scrutiny. What about children, particularly newborn children? What about those people whose past is entirely unknown?

然则,上述陈述涵盖面过于宽泛。"任何人"涵盖了世界上所有的人。有些人的名誉反而会因为媒体的聚焦而陡然显赫起来。也有些人,其名声早就如此之糟糕,以致于媒体的聚焦再也无法让它受到更坏的毁损。笼统地陈述受媒体报道的"任何人"均会使其地位被玷污,这暗示着全球每个人的名声在任何种类的媒体聚焦下均易于遭诟病。那么,对于天真无辜的孩子们,尤其新生婴儿,情况会如何?对于那些其过去根本无人知晓的人来说,情况又会是什么样呢?

Another problem with such a broad statement is that it does not define the particular level of media scrutiny. Certainly there are different levels of media coverage. Does merely the mention of one's name in a newspaper

constitute media scrutiny? What about the coverage of a single event in someone's life, for example a wedding or the birth of a baby? Is the media coverage of the heroic death of a firefighter or police officer in the line of duty ever going to diminish that person's reputation? It seems highly unlikely that in these examples, although these people may have been subjected to media scrutiny, these individual's reputations are undamaged and potentially enhanced by such exposure.

对于这样一项笼统的陈述而言,它的另一个问题是没能明晰界定媒体聚焦的具体程度。媒体的报道毫无疑问存在程度上的差别。只在报纸上提及一个人的名字,是否算作媒体聚焦?对某人一生中单独一次事件(如婚礼或孩子出生)的报道这也算媒介聚焦吗?媒体对消防队员或警官因公而死的英雄壮举进行报道,难道也会毁损该人的名声吗?在这些实例中,其名声受损的事情极不可能发生。虽然这些人可能被置于媒体审视之下,但其名声却会完好无损,且潜在地可因这些披露而得以提高。

Without a doubt, there are many examples of individual's whose reputations have been diminished by media scrutiny. The media's uncovering of former U.S. President Bill Clinton's affair with Monica Lewinsky will most likely overshadow the entire eight years of his administration. Basketball superstar Michael Jordan's sterling reputation has been

tarnished more than once by the media; first by media coverage of his gambling habits, then most recently (and in a much more harmful manner) by news reports of his marital infidelities and the divorce from his wife of thirteen years. Fame and fortune can turn an ordinary individual into a media target where reporters will stop at almost nothing to "dig up dirt" that will sell more newspapers or entice more viewers to watch a television program. It could even be

argued that media scrutiny killed Princess Diana as her car sped away from the privacy-invading cameras of reporters in Paris. There is no doubt that there are a large number of people who have been hurt in one way or another by particularly intense media scrutiny.

毫无疑问,也有许多例子能证明一个人的名声会被媒体审视所毁损。媒体对美国前总统Bill Clinton与Monica Lewinsky的风流韵事的揭露极有可能会将其八年的执政生涯置于阴影之中。超级篮球明星Michael Jordan一世英名也被媒体不止一次地玷污,首先是被有关其赌习的媒体报道,其次是最近--且以一种更具致命性伤害的方式--被有关他婚姻不忠以及与其结婚13年的妻子分道扬镳的报道。当媒体记者不择手段去挖掘某些可促使其报纸销量大增的"猛料"时,或去诱惑更多的观众观看某一电视节目时,名和利就会将一个普通人转变为媒体追踪的目标。我们甚至可以提出这样一种论点,即正是媒体的审视将Diana王妃置于死地,随着她的汽车去竭力逃脱巴黎街头的记者们那侵犯隐私的相机镜头。毫无疑问,肯定有许多人被极其强烈的媒体聚焦以一种方式或另一种方式所伤害。

In summary, it seems impossible that for every person that is subjected to media scrutiny, his or her reputation will eventually be diminished. Millions of people are mentioned in the media every day yet still manage to go about their lives unhurt by the media. Normal individuals that are subjected to media scrutiny can have their reputation either

enhanced or damaged depending on the circumstances surrounding the media coverage. The likelihood of a diminished reputation from the media rises proportionally with the level of notoriety that an individual possesses and the

outrageousness of that person's behavior. The length of time in the spotlight can also be a determining factor, as the longer the person is examined in the media, the greater the possibility that damaging information will be discovered or that the individual will do something to disparage his or her reputation. But to broadly state that media scrutiny will diminish anyone's reputation is to overstate the distinct possibility that, given a long enough time and a certain level of intensity of coverage, the media may damage a person's reputation.

(766words)

归纳而言,对于每个被置于媒体审视的人来说,其名声将最终受到毁损似乎并不可能。每天,有数百万人被媒体提到,但他们仍设法我行我素,不为媒体所伤害。被置于媒体审视之下的普通人,其名声或可得到提高,或可蒙受毁损,取决于围绕着媒体报道的具体情况。一个人的名声受媒体毁损的可能性,与所其拥有的臭名昭著的程度,及其行为的令人厌恶程度成正比。受媒体关注的时间长短同样也是一个决定性因素,因为一个人被媒体审视的时间越长,于他名声不利的信息越有可能被抖落出来,或者该人越有可能去做出某些于其名声不利的事情。但只是笼统地陈述媒体的审视终将毁掉一个人的名声,即是过分夸大这样一种显著的可能性,即在足够长的时间和一度程度的报道力度这两个条件下,媒体是有可能毁掉一个人的名声的。

GRE作文范文

GRE作文范文

Issue

"People work more productively in teams than individually. Teamwork requires cooperation, which motivates people much more than individual competition does."

Sample Essay

Teamwork as a whole can naturally produce an overall greater productivity through the concept of "synergy", where the total of the whole is greater than the sum of its individual parts. But the idea that people work more productively in teams rather than as individuals is going to vary greatly between the types of teams that are organized, the end reward or motivation for both the team and the individuals, as well as the individuals themselves.

Regarding individuals, some people are born with the desire to succeed, no matter what the situation or task that they are facing. These people may evolve into the classic "Type A" personalities that work ferociously because they are driven by an internal fire that says they must always be doing something, whether individually or as part of a team. Other people may desire to be less socially involved or are very highly competitive with other people. For these people, their work is most productive as individuals, because the very idea of cooperating with other people limits their

effectiveness and efficiency because they simply do not want to be a part of the team. Whether this mindset is innate or developed over time does not matter, it is merely the state of their being and neither motivation nor rewards can generate inside them the desire to work collectively as a team.

Some people are highly motivated by social interaction and the desire to work with others towards a collective effort. Obviously these individuals are at their most productive when working as part of a team. Organizational behavioral studies have shown that Asian cultures are much more likely to develop this type of collective behavior as opposed to the more individualistic behavior associated with Western cultures. It could naturally be assumed then that there may be cultural values that can determine whether people are at their most productive individually or as part of a team.

Another variable is the end reward that is involved with the task at hand. Will the rewards be greater if the team

works together towards a common goal, or are the rewards more geared toward individual performance? To the extent that the individual is motivated by the end reward, obviously his or her performance inside of a team may be more or less productive with respect to the entire team, depending on how the performance is rewarded. Individual goals may interfere with the group performance. Synergies may not be achieved because the individuals are not working towards a whole "sum" but rather towards an individual reward. Productivity thus will vary for each person as a team member or as an individual depending on the degree to which that person is motivated by an individual or overall team reward.

Finally, the degree of productivity of a person will depend upon the type of team that is organized. Is the group composed of equally contributing individuals? Does the group have an outstanding leader that can motivate both the individuals and the team as a whole? From a pure productivity standpoint, the presence or absence of a charismatic and exceptional leader can make all the difference whether a person would be more productive as a part of a team or as an individual. Personality types that work well together can prove to be much more productive as part of a team than as individuals, and vice versa.

Fundamentally, measures of productivity depend greatly on the individuals themselves. The dilemma facing leaders in all areas of life is how to best assess these individuals to determine how to best harness their capabilities to reach their ultimate productive capabilities. Whether a person is more productive alone or while working in concert with

others is one of the great challenges that leaders and managers must face to accomplish tasks effectively and efficiently.

观点陈述型作文/[题目]

"当人们以团队的形式工作时,要比以孤军奋战的形式来得更加富有成效。团队的协同工作需要相互合作,它比个人竞争更能激励人们。"

范文正文

总体而言,团队的协同工作自然能通过"增效作用"(Synergy)这一理念而带来更高程度的整体生产效率,因为在这里,整体大于个体相加之总和。然则,"当人们以团队的形式工作时,要比以孤军奋战的形式来得更加富有成效"这一观念注定会产生巨大差异,取决于所组织起来的团队的类别,团队与个人所能获得的终极回报或激励,以及个人本身。

关于个人,有些人天生就具有获取成功的欲望,无论他们所面临的情形或任务是什么。这些人会演变为工作狂这一经典的"A类"人格,因为受到一股内心的热火所驱使,这股热火时刻告诉他们必须不停